- Investment Expertise
We’re finding that an increasing number of institutional, pension fund and high-net-worth investors are turning to private equity in order to enhance their portfolio performance.
We are committed to supporting the insurance sector and have a dedicated insurance solutions team.
- Our insight
The House View process provides a consistent macroeconomic framework to analysing global financial markets.
Our Head of Global Strategy, Andrew Milligan, introduces the latest edition of Global Outlook, a summary of our House View.
Standard Life Investments’ Global Strategy team provide regular analysis of the key economic data that has been influencing financial markets.
Our global strategists combine valuable experience, thorough research and analysis to tackle major issues of the moment.
Governance and stewardship is about making sure that companies’ operational processes and policies are robust and responsible.
- How we discharge our stewardship responsibilities
- Our policy for managing conflicts of interests
- How we monitor our investee companies
- Our guidelines for escalating engagement
- Our willingness to act collectively with other investors
- Our policy on voting and voting disclosure
- How we report on stewardship to our clients
We recognise the importance of transparency and accountability when it comes to our stewardship responsibilities. To this end, we have published an annual review of our governance and stewardship activities, which provides an account of how we have fulfilled our responsibilities. Please select the link below to view the 2016 annual review.2016 annual review
- Responsible Investment
We recognise that the management of environmental and social responsibilities is subject to many factors, and take into account the particular circumstances, industries and locations in which the companies operate.
We've produced guidelines on responsible investment to explain how we evaluate the environmental and social policies of the companies in which we are (or might be) an investor.
Weekly Economic Briefing
Japan & Developed Asia
25 April 2017
Bank of Japan (BoJ) has thrown the kitchen sink at Japan’s inflation problems, following years of criticism that it had been too timid. The monetary arrow of Abenomics has dwarfed the quantitative easing (QE) measures carried out by other central banks. The BoJ has expanded its balance sheet by 14% of GDP a year since 2013, significantly faster than that seen in the Eurozone, US and UK since the crisis (see Chart 7). This has taken the BoJ’s balance sheet to an eye watering 88% of GDP, well above the European Central Bank’s 34%, which is the next largest among the major central banks. The BoJ now owns around 40% of the stock of Japanese government bonds, alongside a range of assets from exchange traded funds to real estate investment trusts.
The BoJ has come up against two challenges. First, the results from its monetary expansion have been disappointing. While the Japanese economy does look to be making progress toward reflation, this has been frustratingly slow. Second, declining asset pools have naturally led to questions over the ability of the central bank to continue buying indefinitely. These forces triggered a shift in the BoJ’s policy approach to incorporate yield curve control, with the 10-year government bond yield not allowed to deviate far from 0%. In part, this new framework was designed to improve the sustainability of policy, with yield targets potentially providing the BoJ freedom to reduce the pace of asset purchases over time. This has not always been the case so far, with the BoJ often having had to defend its yield target when markets tested its commitment to this new policy (see Chart 8). We continue to believe that the short term commitment to the current yield target remains strong, with the triggers on the inflation side that would justify a change not materialising.
Kuroda was certainly right last week that it was “premature” to discuss any exit from BoJ stimulus. However, the size of the BoJ’s balance sheet does pose long-term challenges. If the central bank achieves its inflation objectives, then navigating an exit will require careful calibration. Balance sheet expansion has not as yet spurred financial imbalances or a rapid shift in inflation. However, the BoJ will need to be alert that this dynamic does not shift if we do see evidence of reflation setting in. On the flip side, if the BoJ were to unwind its balance sheet too quickly, helped by asset sales, this could lead to an aggressive tightening in financial conditions which could derail the economy. Moreover, the BoJ would risk making losses on its asset holdings, denting its capital position. Interestingly, it is already retaining a greater portion of earnings to try and build these buffers. In some regards these would be nice problems to have. If the BoJ’s reflation efforts prove unsuccessful then policy choices become even harder. A failure to exit current policy settings will extend and deepen the distortions in Japanese financial markets from asset purchases and yield targets. In particular, the BoJ’s policies embed easy financing conditions for the Japanese government, in spite of high public debt. If the government becomes ever more reliant on this support then the lines between fiscal and monetary policy will blur. This could threaten the independence of the central bank to follow its inflation targeting mandate. Instead, fiscal dominance could emerge, with the central bank under pressure to underpin the public finances.
James McCann, Senior Global Economist
The views and conclusions expressed in this communication are for general interest only and should not be taken as investment advice or as an invitation to purchase or sell any specific security.
Any data contained herein which is attributed to a third party ("Third Party Data") is the property of (a) third party supplier(s) (the "Owner") and is licensed for use by Standard Life**. Third Party Data may not be copied or distributed. Third Party Data is provided "as is" and is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. To the extent permitted by applicable law, none of the Owner, Standard Life** or any other third party (including any third party involved in providing and/or compiling Third Party Data) shall have any liability for Third Party Data or for any use made of Third Party Data. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Neither the Owner nor any other third party sponsors, endorses or promotes the fund or product to which Third Party Data relates.
**Standard Life means the relevant member of the Standard Life group, being Standard Life plc together with its subsidiaries, subsidiary undertakings and associated companies (whether direct or indirect) from time to time.